Our Provider’s Blog


Colorectal Cancer Rates Rising in People Aged 50 to 54 Years

Megan Brooks

November 11, 2021

New US data show that the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is on the rise among people aged 50–54 years, mirroring the well-documented increases in early-onset CRC in persons younger than 50 years.

“It’s likely that the factors contributing to CRC at age 50–54 years are the same factors that contribute to early-onset CRC, which has increased in parallel,” Caitlin Murphy, PhD, MPH, with the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, told Medscape Medical News.

Dr Caitlin Murphy

“Many studies published in just the last year show that the well-known risk factors of CRC in older adults, such as obesity or sedentary lifestyle, are risk factors of CRC in younger adults. Growing evidence also suggests that early life exposures, or exposures in childhood, infancy, or even in the womb, play an important role,” Murphy said.

The study was published online October 28 in Gastroenterology.

Murphy and colleagues examined trends in age-specific CRC incidence rates for individuals aged 45–49, 50–54, and 55–59 years using the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program.

During the period 1992–2018, there were a total of 101,609 cases of CRC among adults aged 45–59 years.

Further analysis showed that the CRC incidence rates rose from 23.4 to 34.0 per 100,000 among people aged 45–49 years and from 46.4 to 63.8 per 100,000 among those aged 50–54 years.

Conversely, incidence rates decreased among individuals aged 55–59 years, from 81.7 to 63.7 per 100,000 persons.

“Because of this opposing trend ― or decreasing rates for age 55–59 years and increasing rates for age 50–54 years ― incidence rates for the two age groups were nearly identical in 2016–18,” the researchers write.

They also found a “clear pattern” of increasing CRC incidence among adults in their early 50s, supporting the hypothesis that incidence rates increase at older ages as higher-risk generations mature, the researchers note.

These data send a clear message, Murphy told Medscape Medical News.

“Don’t delay colorectal cancer screening. Encourage on-time screening by discussing screening with patients before they reach the recommended age to initiate screening. The US Preventive Services Task Force now recommends initiating average-risk screening at age 45 years,” Murphy said.

Concerning but Not Surprising

Rebecca Siegel, MPH, scientific director of Surveillance Research at the American Cancer Society, in Atlanta, Georgia, who wasn’t involved in the study, said the results are “not surprising” and mirror the results of a 2017 study that showed that the incidence of CRC was increasing among individuals aged 50–54 years, as reported by Medscape Medical News.

What’s “concerning,” Siegel said, is that people in this age group “have been recommended to be screened for CRC for decades. Hopefully, because the age to begin screening has been lowered from 50 to 45 years, this uptick will eventually flatten.”

David Johnson, MD, professor of medicine and chief of gastroenterology at Eastern Virginia Medical School, in Norfolk, Virginia, who also wasn’t involved in the study, said the increasing incidence is “concerning in this younger population, and similar to what is seen recently for the 45- to 49-year-old population.

“Recent data have linked dietary influences in the early development of precancerous colon polyps and colon cancer. The increased ingestion of processed foods and sugary beverages, most of which contain high fructose corn syrup, is very likely involved in the pathogenesis to explain these striking epidemiologic shifts,” Johnson told Medscape Medical News.

“These concerns will likely be compounded by the COVID-related adverse effects on people [in terms of] appropriate, timely colorectal cancer screening,” Johnson added.

The study was supported by the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health. Murphy has consulted for Freenome. Siegel and Johnson have reported no relevant financial relationships.

Gastroenterology. Published online October 28, 2021. Abstract

For more news, follow Medscape on FacebookTwitterInstagram, and YouTube.



 

COLOGUARD vs COLONOSCOPY🥊🥊
 
Many patients are confused about their choice of colon cancer screening. This is due to the very real fear of both the disease, and also the preps associated with the screening colonoscopy. The practice of medicine in recent years has not been immune to marketing and advertising. Such has been the case with Cologuard testing which I first noticed during the Stanley Cup Playoffs a few years ago. I thought uh oh, here we go!
 
Colon cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths in the US and around the world. It is however, a preventable disease. Screening and removing pre-cancerous polyps can prevent the disease in most cases. We have seen a significant decrease in colon cancer deaths since instituting screening colonoscopy in the last 3 decades. Colonoscopy is truly the gold standard for screening and prevention of colon cancer.
 
This brings us to the question of why Cologuard? To answer this I think we should first take a look at the data regarding Cologuard. The test involves taking a ‘crap in the hat’ followed by analyzing a patient’s stool for the presence of blood and abnormal DNA which can be present in the setting of polyps or cancer. The test is very good at detecting cancer. If the test is negative there is over a 90% chance that a patient is free of cancer. However, Cologuard misses up to 8% of cancers. Additionally, Cologuard is not good at detecting polyps, missing 50-60% of polyps.
 
As stated above, the goal of screening is to prevent colon cancer. This can only be done by finding and removing polyps. Detecting a cancer is akin to closing the barn door after the horse has exited! This is why most specialists such as Gastroenterologists and Colorectal Surgeons recommend colonoscopy as the screening tool of choice, even in average risk patients (age 45, no family or personal history of polyps/cancer). It allows for detection and removal of polyps.
 
If one pauses the Cologuard commercial, you might be able to read the fine print stating that Cologuard is not recommended in patients with a family history of polyps or cancer, those with a personal history of polyps or cancer, and those with genetic syndromes which predispose them to developing polyps or cancer (Familial polyposis or Lynch syndrome).
 
Cologuard is recommended for use only in average risk patients who have reached 45 years of age and are symptom free. With this in mind, it is important to consider the limitations of the study when it comes to detection of polyps and cancer. It is also important to remember that if one chooses to use Cologuard as their screening method, colonoscopy is required if positive. In this case the colonoscopy is considered ‘diagnostic’, and therefore will be billed as ‘diagnostic’, not screening, with the patient often being responsible for some or all of the cost depending on their insurance plan and deductible.
 
Cologuard is certainly easier for the patient, but has the significant limitations noted above. Colonoscopy is a very comfortable procedure, done with sedation/anesthesia. There is no pain associated with removal of polyps or biopsy. The biggest complaint is the prep, which has improved significantly in recent years.
 
If you simply can’t come to grips with doing a colonoscopy, we understand, that’s part of being human. As health care professionals who specialize in GI care, Gastroenterologists and Colorectal Surgeons are here to help you through the decision process. We will make your colonoscopy as simple and comfortable as possible.
 
Call us or visit our website to make an appointment or schedule a colonoscopy
 
812-301-8110
colondoc.net


logo

 

  Bowel obstruction refers to blockage of the intestinal tract. This most commonly affects the colon or small bowel, but can occur in the stomach or esophagus as well. Small bowel obstruction is much more common than colonic obstruction, with colon cancer being the most common cause of colon obstruction. That said, colon cancer presents with obstruction in only 2-3% of cases.

Small bowel obstruction results from either partial or complete blockage of the intestinal lumen. This can be the result of a variety of causes.

  • Adhesions in 60%

  • Cancer 20%

  • Hernia 10%

  • Inflammation from diseases such as Crohn’s, ulcerative colitis, and diverticulitis in 5%

 As can be seen, adhesions are the most common cause of obstruction. An adhesion represents scar tissue which forms after surgery. They are the most common cause of small bowel obstruction as noted. Adhesions can occur after any abdominal surgery. They are more common after extensive surgeries such as pelvic or colon surgeries. Adhesions can result in torsion/twisting of the bowel…much like we see with a garden hose. This results in kinking of the bowel and possible compromise of the blood supply

Tumors/cancers can also cause obstruction. This is most commonly seen with metastatic cancers from the outside of the bowel. Small bowel cancers are rare, and colon cancer presents with obstruction in only a small percentage of cases (2-3%). The most common types of cancer causing obstruction include ovarian, pancreatic, stomach, colon, lung, and breast. The obstruction is caused by direct invasion and compression of the bowel.

 Hernias can also cause obstruction and are a result of a loop of small bowel or colon becoming trapped within the hernia. Inflammation of various cause can also result in scarring and blockage of the bowel…Crohn’s, ulcerative colitis, diverticulitis.

 Patients with obstruction present with crampy abdominal pain, abdominal distension, and eventually nausea and vomitting. They will stop passing stool or gas after the intestinal tract below the obstruction has emptied. The continued passage of small amounts of gas and stool while still having symptoms is indicative of a partial obstruction.

Our evaluation consists of a good history and physical exam followed by basic laboratory studies and Xray/CT scan to make the diagnosis.

Treatment consists of IV fluid support, use of a nasogastric tube to decompress the bowel, and repeat examination of the patient. Approximately 50% of patients will have spontaneous resolution of the obstruction…as the same spontaneous process of rotation which caused the problem may reverse itself. If the patient shows no improvement in 24-48 hrs, or deterioration in condition, surgery is warranted. Simple lysis (division) of adhesions is all that is required in most cases. This can sometimes be done by minimally invasive surgery. Reduction and repair of hernia is done when an incarcerated hernia is the cause of obstruction. More extensive surgery may be required for more serious causes.

Patients often ask…”how can I prevent this from happening”?  The honest answer is that there is no proven method of prevention. Surgeons attempt to minimize the ‘injury’ caused by surgery, hoping to minimize risk. Even with this, an obstruction can occur at any time in a patient who has had abdominal surgery. They are not caused by diet or activity. It is important for patients to recognize the symptoms and seek medical care if they develop any of the symptoms described above.

 

 



JOIN US FOR A FECAL INCONTINENCE VIRTUAL CONFERENCE AT 6:00 PM ON TUESDAY,  FEBRUARY 23. THE DISCUSSION WILL BE HOSTED BY DR. HEATHER MATHESON AND IS SPONSORED BY MEDTRONIC. 

DR. MATHESON WILL DISCUSS THE EVALUATION AND TREATMENT OF INCONTINENCE INCLUDING THE NEWEST TECHNIQUE OF ‘SACRAL NERVE STIMULATION’ THERAPY. THERE WILL BE TIME FOR QUESTIONS FOLLOWING HER PRESENTATION.

 

May be an image of 1 person and text that says 'AREBOWELACCIDENTSAREGULAR ACCIDENTS THING? WE CAN HELP Find relief today! Join us for free virtual educational event and earn options for control. The event will be 60-minutes and allow time for questions. DATE: Tuesday Feb 23rd TIME: 6:00 pm Register by clicking the link below Dr Heather Matheson Tri-State Colorectal Group'



THE TERM INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE REFERS TO TWO DISEASES; ULCERATIVE COLITITIS AND CROHN’S DISEASE.THESE DISEASES CAUSE INFLAMMATION OF THE BOWEL. THE CAUSE OF EACH REMAINS UNKNOWN, THOUGH THERE IS INCREASING EVIDENCE THAT THEY MAY BE RELATED TO COMPLEX INTERACTIONS BETWEEN THE BACTERIA OF THE GUT WITH DIET, ANTIBIOTICS, AND OTHER INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL FACTORS. BOTH DISEASES CAUSE NON-SPECIFIC INFLAMMATION OF THE GI TRACK. THIS RESULTS IN SYMPTOMS WHICH ARE COMMON TO BOTH DISEASES.

ULCERATIVE COLITIS ( UC ) INVOLVES ONLY THE COLON WITH THE INFLAMMATION LIMITED TO THE MUCOSA ( INTERNAL LINING ) . THE DISEASE IS ALSO CONTINUOUS, BEGINNING IN THE LOWER RECTUM WITH EXTENSION ANYWHERE FROM ONLY A FEW INCHES TO INVOLVEMENT OF THE ENTIRE COLON. THERE ARE NO SKIP AREAS. CROHN’S DISEASE ( CD ), IN CONTRAST, CAN INVOLVE ANY PORTION OF THE GI TRACK FROM THE MOUTH TO THE ANUS, AND CAN CAUSE FULL THICKNESS INFLAMMATION OF THE BOWEL WALL. SKIP AREAS ARE ALSO COMMON. THIS DISEASE OFTEN PRESENTS WITH INVOLVEMENT OF THE LAST PORTION OF THE SMALL BOWEL ( TERMINAL ILEUM ) AND THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE COLON IN THE AREA OF THE APPENDIX.

THE SYMPTOMS ARE SIMILAR IN BOTH DISEASES AND CONSIST OF CHANGES IN BOWEL PATTERN WITH LOOSE STOOL, URGENCY TO HAVE A BOWEL MOVEMENT, CRAMPING, BLEEDING, ABDOMINAL TENDERNESS, AND ANORECTAL DISCOMFORT IN PATIENTS WITH WITH ABCESSES, FISTULAE AND FISSURES. IN LONGSTANDING CASES WITH PROLONGED SYMPTOMS AND LACK OF ADEQUATE DIETARY INTAKE PATIENTS CAN DEVELOP SEVERE WEIGHT LOSS AND BECOME MALNOURISHED.

EVALUATION OF PATIENTS BEGINS WITH A THOROUGH HISTORY AND PHYSICAL EXAM FOLLOWED BY TESTING WHICH CAN INCLUDE BLOOD WORK LOOKING FOR MARKERS FOUND WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE. ALMOST ALL PATIENTS WILL REQUIRE EXAMINATION OF THE GI TRACT WITH DIRECT OBSERVATION AND BIOPSIES. THIS WILL INCLUDE COLONOSCOPY AND SOMETIMES UPPER ENDOSCOPY AND CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY. IT IS IMPORTANT TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT AND SEVERITY OF THE DISEASE TO GUIDE MEDICAL AND SURGICAL TREATMENT IN THOSE PATIENTS WHERE SURGERY IS NEEDED. IT IS ALSO IMPORTANT TO RULE OUT OTHER CAUSES OF INFLAMMATION SUCH AS INFECTIONS, IRRITABLE BOWEL, MEDICATION EFFECTS INCLUDING ANTIBIOTICS, AND TUMORS…BOTH BENIGN AND MALIGNANT.

IN ADDITION TO THE SYMPTOMS CAUSED BY THE INFLAMMATION, APPROXIMATELY 20% OF PATIENTS MAY EXPERIENCE WHAT ARE CALLED EXTRA-INTESTINAL PROBLEMS SUCH AS DERMATITIS, ARTHRITIS, AND INFLAMMATION IN OTHER PARTS OF THE BODY.

TREATMENT FALLS INTO TWO GENERAL CATEGORIES; MEDICAL AND SURGICAL. THE VAST MAJORITY OF PATIENTS ARE STARTED ON MEDICAL THERAPY AND CAN BE SUCCESSFULLY CONTROLLED WITH THE USE OF MEDICATIONS.

MEDICATIONS USED TO BRING THE SYMPTOMS UNDER CONTROL FALL INTO SEVERAL CATEGORIES;

1) STEROIDS

2) AMINOSALICYLATES ( ANTI-INFLAMMATORY ), WHICH CAN BE USED BOTH ORALLY AND RECTALLY.

3) IMMUNOSUPPRESANTS

4) MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY THERAPY ( INFLIXIMAB, ADALIMUMAB )

5) ANTIBIOTICS ( CIPRO, FLAGYL )

THESE MEDICATIONS WORK IN DIFFERENT WAYS TO DECREASE THE INFLAMMATION BEING CAUSED BY THE DISEASE, WITH ANTIBIOTICS SOMETIMES USED FOR TREATMENT OF ANORECTAL DISEASE.

WHEN MEDICAL THERAPY FAILS TO CONTROL THE DISEASE, WITH DEVELOPMENT OF COMPLICATIONS OR CHRONIC DEBILITATING SYMPTOMS, SURGICAL THERAPY IS INDICATED. THE SURGICAL THERAPY IS VERY DIFFERENT FOR THE TWO DISEASES. WITH UC, REMOVAL OF THE COLON IS CURATIVE. THIS CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED BY REMOVING THE ENTIRE COLON AND RECTUM WITH CREATION OF AN ILEOSTOMY, OR AS IS DONE MORE COMMONLY IN THE LAST 30 YEARS, REMOVAL OF THE ENTIRE COLON AND RECTUM WITH CREATION OF A ‘J’ POUCH FROM THE SMALL BOWEL TO SERVE AS AN ARTIFICIAL RECTUM.

CROHN’S DISEASE IN CONTRAST IS NOT CURATIVE BY SURGICAL REMOVAL, AS 40% OR MORE OF PATIENTS WILL EVENTUALLY DEVELOP RECURRENT DISEASE. FOR THIS REASON IN CROHN’S PATIENTS REQUIRING SURGERY, ONLY THE INVOLVED SEGMENTS OF SMALL BOWEL OR COLON ARE REMOVED. MOST PATIENTS ARE THEN CONTINUED ON LONG TERM MEDICAL THERAPY.

IN SUMMARY, INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE IS A CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASE OF THE BOWEL OF UNCERTAIN CAUSE. IN MOST PATIENTS IT CAN BE MANAGED BY MEDICAL THERAPY WITH SURGERY LIMITED TO THOSE WHO DEVELOP SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS OR INTRACTABLE DISEASE. SURGERY IS CURATIVE WITH ULCERATIVE COLITIS IN CONTRAST WITH CROHN’S DISEASE WHERE RECURRENCES ARE COMMON.


CHRONIC RECTAL OR PELVIC PAIN As we have discussed in previous articles, there are 3 common causes of rectal pain. THROMBOSED HEMORRHOIDS, FISSURES, AND ABCESSES. There are a number of causes of less significant irritation such as pruritus, skin tags, and anything else that can irritate the skin.

The least common cause of pain falls in the category of something we call Levator Syndrome/Spastic Levator/Pelvic Floor syndrome, or Chronic Proctalgia. Proctalgia literally translates to ‘rectal pain’. This can be intermittent discomfort which occurs over a matter of a few minutes and dissipates just as quickly, typically occurring at night, and called Proctalgia Fugax ( fleeting pain in the rectum ); or more chronic pain which can last days, weeks or in some cases many years. We refer to this more chronic discomfort as Levator or Pelvic floor syndrome. Although this has been related to pelvic surgery, or certain jobs requiring prolonged sitting or maintaining certain positioning, my experience has been that most often I can find no obvious cause! I have in fact seen it in a patient who had no rectum, it having been removed for inflammatory bowel disease many years before. Though we often use the term rectal to describe the pain, it is in fact in the muscles of the pelvic floor and the sphincter muscles. Examination will show no abnormalities on anorectal exam and colonoscopy. The diagnosis is made by eliciting pain on rectal exam within the sphincter and levator muscles of the pelvic floor. It is most often more severe on the left side.

Treatment can be difficult but is successful in most patients. It consists of warm sitz baths to relax and sooth the muscles. Physical Therapy including Kegel exercises and quite often Physical Therapy referral for more specialized treatment. If these measures alone are not effective, medicines such as Elavil ( amitriptyline ) can be used in low doses to bring about relief of pain. Though it is a benign disease it can be quite bothersome to patients. It is important when treating to remind patients that although it can take time, the majority of patients will get relief of their pain.

If you are suffering rectal pain, change in bowel pattern, rectal bleeding, or any colonic symptom…seek the advice of a Colorectal Surgeon! Remember, patients treated by Colorectal Surgeons have better outcomes. WWW.colondocs.net



A question many patients ask us, often joking, is “what made you want to become a butt doctor?”

The answer is actually much simpler than you think. We love it! We have a passion for it! We enjoy the work! Does that sound crazy? Well it’s far from crazy and here’s why.

Colorectal surgery can be difficult, the anatomy and physiology, the surgical technique. It requires extra training. But it’s also difficult physically and emotionally for patients and their families. Undergoing the exams and treatment can be embarrassing! Whether dealing with a painful but benign anorectal problem or a colon cancer. To paraphrase something President Kennedy said about the space program; we don’t choose to do it because it is easy, we choose to do it because it is hard! We want our community, the Tri-state area to have the finest in colorectal care. We want every patients to feel as comfortable and safe as possible during what is a very stressful time. We want them to have the very best in care and the best outcomes possible. Outcomes that we know are better when done by a Colorectal Surgeon. With this comes much satisfaction…and we receive from our patients, families, and community much more than we could ever give! It is a joy and a privilege to get to do what we do; to go to work each morning. So yes, we love it, and that fuels in us a passion to strive to be better every day.

The Physicians and Staff of Tri-State Colorectal



Quite simply, fecal incontinence refers to the inability to control bowel movements; resulting in the accidental loss of stool. This is a very significant problem for anyone affected. It can be debilitating to the point of making one a ‘bathroom cripple’; as it can be almost impossible to leave the house. In its mildest form patients might experience minimal seepage and drainage. In more serious cases, there is no control of bowel movements. The symptoms can be brought on by anything which changes stool consistency causing loose stool. This can be as simple as dietary factors; or more significant diseases causing inflammation of the colon. If there is no underlying muscle weakness, simply treating the underlying condition, correcting the loose stool, will treat the problem. Conditions caused by muscle weakness may also be treated by thickening the stool; but also require thorough examination of the pelvic floor muscles to evaluate their function. In many cases treatment of both stool consistency and muscle weakness are required to bring the patient adequate control.

The problem is much more common than physicians previously suspected. In the past there were few effective treatments and physicians and patients were reluctant to talk about the problem. We now recognize that it is a very common problem, especially among women who have had natural childbirth. During childbirth there is stretching and injury to the pelvic floor muscles and nerves. This causes temporary weakness that usually causes no problems in young women with normal muscle strength. Over time however, many women will experience gradual ongoing deterioration of nerve and muscle function, with increasing weakness. This results in worsening symptoms of leakage as they approach their 50s and 60s. This is in contrast to someone who has a significant muscle injury during childbirth, or patients who suffer an injury as a result of trauma. These patients respond well to simple muscle repair at the time of injury. This is in stark contrast to older women found to have a muscle defect from previous injury. Muscle repair is rarely successful in these patients. In fact, non operative treatment is very effective in most patients. Evaluation of patients suffering from symptoms of incontinence include a detailed history and physical exam. Examination quite often requires colonoscopy to rule out cancer or inflammation. In addition to standard rectal exam; ultrasound is used to examine the muscle for any possible defects and manometry is done to evaluate the strength of the muscle. Ultrasound and manometry can both be performed in the comfort of our office; taking only a few minutes to complete.

Treatment is then determined by the findings on our exams. We quite often will start by taking measures to thicken the stool such as the use of fiber products and antidiarrheal medicines. Physical therapy can be started to strengthen the muscles. For those people who fail medical treatment there are a couple of surgical options depending upon findings on ultrasound. As mentioned above, with significant muscle disruption, a surgical repair can be done. Unfortunately this has been found to be of limited effectiveness, and is rarely attempted.

In recent years a minimally invasive treatment using electrical nerve stimulation has been developed which has revolutionized the treatment of incontinence. Using a device called a sacral nerve stimulator, the nerves to the pelvic floor can be stimulated; improving muscle function and control. The device is placed under the skin as an outpatient procedure, much like a pacemaker is used for the heart.

In summary; we now have very effective treatment for incontinence! No need to suffer in silence!

If you are experiencing symptoms of incontinence, or have any other colorectal problems; contact us. As Colorectal Surgeons we have the training and expertise to best evaluate and treat your colorectal problems. Thank you, The physicians and staff of Tri-State Colorectal



Rectal pain, or more correctly, anal pain; has a number of causes. I say anal pain because the lower rectum and the internal anal canal are not sensitive to pain in the usual sense. These portions of the intestinal track are lined by cells found within the intestinal track and supplied by ‘gut’ nerve fibers which are not sensitive to sharp pain. This allows us to treat internal hemorrhoids, which line the internal anal canal, very differently than external hemorrhoids and other conditions which can cause anal (anorectal ) pain. In fact, this is what allows us to remove polyps or do biopsies during colonoscopy without causing any post procedure pain. Keep this in mind as we discuss the causes of anorectal pain. With conditions affecting the rectum or internal anal canal, patients may have a sensation of pressure or an uncomfortable urge to go to the bathroom; but not the type of pain that we experience from an injury to the skin or ‘external’ anal canal. The external anal canal is lined with a modified type of skin cell and nerve fibers which make it very sensitive to pain! Most of us have experienced this at one time or another during our lives. The program director of my Colorectal Surgery residency had a saying “you don’t have to be a genius to be a colorectal surgeon”. The reason; there are only three common causes of anorectal pain, and all three are visible without inserting a finger or a scope!

THROMBOSED HEMORRHOIDS

ANAL FISSURES

PERIRECTAL ABCESS

There are other causes of less severe discomfort such as pruritus ( burning and itching ), skin tags, anal warts, and even muscular pain within the pelvic floor. Notice that thrombosed hemorrhoids are one of only a number of conditions, and not even the most common! As I have pointed out in previous articles, hemorrhoids are normal structures. They consist of columns of vascular tissue within the anal canal. That portion within the INTERNAL anal canal is relatively insensitive to pain, can cause painless bleeding and protrusion, and can be treated by a variety of methods including the most common; hemorrhoid ligation. The hemorrhoidal tissue lying within the external canal, which is the area just around anal opening and within the lower 1-2 cm of the anal opening, is very sensitive to pain. As most of us are aware, even those of us in the medical profession; most health care workers and patients refer to any anorectal pain as being a ‘hemorrhoid’. I have seen countless patients referred to me over the years being told that they had a ‘hemorrhoid’, regardless of their symptoms. Though it is technically true that they have a hemorrhoid, most patients have another cause of their discomfort. In my practice I found the most common cause of pain to be an anal fissure. More about that later. I started all my medical school lectures with the phrase, “all that hurts in the anorectal area is not a hemorrhoid!’ In fact, the only time a hemorrhoid causes pain is when one or more of the 3 hemorrhoids becomes thrombosed. Thrombosed hemorrhoids occur when the the blood vessels within the hemorrhoid become clotted ( thrombosed). This causes swelling, inflammation and pain. The swelling is visible on simple inspection and visualization of the area. The level of pain is dependent upon the amount of clot and whether a single or all three hemorrhoids are involved. Despite the severity of the thrombosis, all cases will resolve on there own, with the pain subsiding in from 3-10 days with the use of warm soaks, topical ointment, and pain medicines. Surgery is never mandatory but can be done in patients with recurrent episodes in order to prevent recurrences. Surgery is painful but effective with a recurrence rate under 5%. The decision to have surgery is strictly up to the patient after consultation with their physician. Anal fissures consist of a crack or tear in the lining of the external anal canal.They are most commonly caused by a hard bowel movement resulting in the tear. Sphincter muscle spasm complicates the condition by causing pain and further difficulty in passing stool. In fact, the muscle spasm is the primary cause of pain. Treatment consists of increasing fiber in the diet, often with the use of a psyllium product, warm soaks, and the application of a topical ointment, or injection of botox, designed to break the muscle spasm. Medical therapy is effective in over 80% of patients. Surgical treatment consists of a partial sphincterotomy ( division of the lowermost fibers of the sphincter ) in order to break the spasm: it is effective in 95% of patients. Anorectal abcess occurs when one of the small mucous glands within the anal canal becomes infected. As with abcesses in other parts of the body they present with swelling, pain, redness and sometimes drainage. The treatment for these is incision and drainage, preferably by a surgeon familiar with the anatomy of the anal canal. There is no place for antibiotics except in patients with severe infections or other complicating conditions… and only after incision and drainage. Several important points to make, especially with the wave of devices advertised to treat hemorrhoids ‘painlessly’ or ‘in the office’.

1) These treatments are strictly for internal hemorrhoids; and only those with symptoms of painless bleeding or protrusion. They should only be done by a physician with specific training in the anatomy, diseases and treatment of anorectal problems 2) If you have a painful condition; seek expert consultation. Thrombosed hemorrhoids, fissures, abcess, skin tags, warts and other skin or muscular pain cannot be treated with a device or technique designed to treat internal hemorrhoids. Seek expert consultation with a Colorectal Surgeon. 3) Patients treated by Colorectal Surgeons have better outcomes!

Thank you, the physicians and Staff of Tri-State Colorectal.



Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer overall in the U.S. There are approximately 140,000 new cases diagnosed yearly; with 50,000 to 60,000 deaths! The risk of developing colon cancer increases with age; especially after the age of 45- 50. Cancer develops from polyps which are abnormal growths from the lining of the colon. It takes a number of years ( 3-5yrs or longer ) for a polyp to grow and undergo the change from benign to cancerous. This gives us the opportunity to examine the colon and remove polyps before they become cancerous. This is the reason that we recommend that everyone begin colon cancer screening by age 45-50 and continue screening every 10 years for life. Patients with a family history of cancer or polyps should begin screening at age 40 or ten years earlier than detection of the poly or cancer in their family member, and continue screening every 5 years. Colonoscopy is a painless procedure in almost all cases; being done under sedation or anesthesia. It is entirely normal to be apprehensive or afraid of any procedure. If you have questions or wish to schedule a colonoscopy don’t hesitate to call us. Our Board Certified Colorectal Surgeons can safely guide you through the entire process and procedure.

The primary treatment of colorectal cancer is surgery.

Patients treated by Colorectal Surgeons have better outcomes.


Designed and Powered by:
CGM Technologies, LLC

Tri-State Colorectal Group
Copyright 2020. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy